Negligence Test AQA A-level Law

Froggy Jumps

Played 1

Create copy

About this activity

Full test for negligence according to AQA A-level law specification

Created by

Jessica Paddock

United Kingdom

Download the paper version to play

Top 10 results

#	Player	Accuracy	time
1	Jessica Paddock May 28, 2025	% 100	00:49

Do you want to stay in the Top 10 of this game? Log in to identify yourself.

Make your own free game from our game creator

Compete against your friends to see who gets the best score in this game

Make challenge

Phlebotomy Order of Draw Quiz

Pamela Chapman

United States

(61)

Test your knowledge of the order of draw in Phlebotomy with these 10 questions!
pizza

Lorelay Tyana

Romania

(268)

joc despre pizza
Ethos, Pathos, and Logos Quiz

Kristine Vester

United States

(134)

Test your knowledge of ethos, pathos, and logos with these 10 questions on examples of persuasive techniques.
Bill of Rights Game - The Constitutionalist

Doni The Don

United States

(92)

Test your knowledge on the Bill of Rights. A fun way to test your knowledge and focus on where you need to improve.
The Integumentary System

Breanna Nesbitt

United States

(59)

Functions and Structures of the skin

		%
	Anonymous	%
		%
		%

Print your game

Negligence Test AQA A-level Law


Froggy Jumps Negligence Test AQA A-level LawOnline version Full test for negligence according to AQA A-level law specification by Jessica Paddock 1 For C to make a successful claim in negligence, it must be proven that reasonable steps were not taken to avoid acts which can be reasonably foreseen to be likely to injure your neighbour (________ v ________). a Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Ltd b Donaghue v Stevenson c Kent v Griffiths 2 Duty of care- pre-existing precedent (________) or novel situation (______ v _______). a (Robinson), (Caparo v Dickman) b (Osman v Ferguson), (Paris v Stepney) c (Bolam v Friern Hospital Management), (Nettleship v Weston) 3 There must be reasonably foreseeable harm (____ v _________). a Smith v Leech Brain & Co. b Kent v Griffiths c The Wagon Mound 4 Proximity through time, space or relationship (_____ v ________). a Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee b McFarlane v Tayside c Osman v Ferguson 5 Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care? (_________ v _______). a McFarlane v Tayside b (Knightly v Johns) c (Bolton v Stone) 6 Standard of care owed by prudent and reasonable man (_____ v __________ __________ ___). a Paris v Stepney b Nettleship v Weston c Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks Ltd 7 Degree of risk (______ v _____). a Bolton v Stone b Paris v Stepney c Jolley v Sutton LBC 8 Practicability of preventative actions (_____ v _______) a Mullins v Richards b Paris v Stepney c Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee 9 Standard of children (_______ v ________) a Mullins v Richards b Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee c Wiltshire v Essex 10 Standard of experts (_____ v _____ ________ _________). a Knightly v Johns b The Wagon Mound c Bolam v Friern Hospital management 11 Standard of learners (_________ v ______). a Smith v Leech Brain & Co b Nettleship v Weston c Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee 12 Factual (_______ v _______ and __________ ________ __________ _________) a Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital Management Committee b The Wagon Mound c Smith v Leech Brain & Co 13 Legal causation- remoteness (___ _____ _____) and reasonable foreseeability (______ v ______ ___) a (Knightly v Johns), (Smith v Leech Brain & Co.) b (The Wagon Mound), (Smith v Leech Brain & Co.) c (The Wagon Mound), (Jolley v Sutton LBC) 14 Multiple causes (__________ v _____) a Wiltshire v Essex b Knightly v Johns c Smith v Leech Brain & Co 15 Intervening acts (________ v _____) a Wiltshire v Essex b Nettleship v Weston c Knightly v Johns 16 Thin skull rule (_____ v _____ _____ & __.) a Jolley v Sutton LBC b Smith v Leech Brain & Co c Bolton v Stone

You can integrate the game into an LMS compatible with LTI 1.1 or LTI 1.3 such as Canvas, Moodle, or Blackboard. This way, the scores will be automatically saved into the platform’s gradebook.

Negligence Test AQA A-level Law

Froggy Jumps

About this activity

Created by

Download the paper version to play

Top Games

Froggy Jumps

Phlebotomy Order of Draw Quiz

Froggy Jumps

pizza

Froggy Jumps

Ethos, Pathos, and Logos Quiz

Froggy Jumps

Bill of Rights Game - The Constitutionalist

Froggy Jumps

The Integumentary System

Froggy Jumps

Negligence Test AQA A-level LawOnline version

by Jessica Paddock

For C to make a successful claim in negligence, it must be proven that reasonable steps were not taken to avoid acts which can be reasonably foreseen to be likely to injure your neighbour ( v ).

Duty of care- pre-existing precedent () or novel situation ( v _).

There must be reasonably foreseeable harm ( v _____).

Proximity through time, space or relationship (_ v ____).

Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care? (___ v _).

Standard of care owed by prudent and reasonable man (_ v __ _).

Degree of risk (__ v _).

Practicability of preventative actions (_ v ___)

Standard of children (_ v __)

Standard of experts (___ v _ ___).

Standard of learners (___ v ).

Factual (___ v _ and ___)

Legal causation- remoteness (_ _ _) and reasonable foreseeability ( v _)

Multiple causes (______ v _)

Intervening acts (____ v _)

Thin skull rule (___ v _ _ & .)

Negligence Test AQA A-level Law

Froggy Jumps

About this activity

Created by

Download the paper version to play

Top Games

Froggy Jumps

Phlebotomy Order of Draw Quiz

Froggy Jumps

pizza

Froggy Jumps

Ethos, Pathos, and Logos Quiz

Froggy Jumps

Bill of Rights Game - The Constitutionalist

Froggy Jumps

The Integumentary System

Froggy Jumps

Negligence Test AQA A-level LawOnline version

by Jessica Paddock

For C to make a successful claim in negligence, it must be proven that reasonable steps were not taken to avoid acts which can be reasonably foreseen to be likely to injure your neighbour (________ v ________).

Duty of care- pre-existing precedent (________) or novel situation (______ v _______).

There must be reasonably foreseeable harm (____ v _________).

Proximity through time, space or relationship (_____ v ________).

Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care? (_________ v _______).

Standard of care owed by prudent and reasonable man (_____ v __________ __________ ___).

Degree of risk (______ v _____).

Practicability of preventative actions (_____ v _______)

Standard of children (_______ v ________)

Standard of experts (_____ v _____ ________ _________).

Standard of learners (_________ v ______).

Factual (_______ v _______ and __________ ________ __________ _________)

Legal causation- remoteness (___ _____ _____) and reasonable foreseeability (______ v ______ ___)

Multiple causes (__________ v _____)

Intervening acts (________ v _____)

Thin skull rule (_____ v _____ _____ & __.)

For C to make a successful claim in negligence, it must be proven that reasonable steps were not taken to avoid acts which can be reasonably foreseen to be likely to injure your neighbour ( v ).

Duty of care- pre-existing precedent () or novel situation ( v _).

There must be reasonably foreseeable harm ( v _____).

Proximity through time, space or relationship (_ v ____).

Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care? (___ v _).

Standard of care owed by prudent and reasonable man (_ v __ _).

Degree of risk (__ v _).

Practicability of preventative actions (_ v ___)

Standard of children (_ v __)

Standard of experts (___ v _ ___).

Standard of learners (___ v ).

Factual (___ v _ and ___)

Legal causation- remoteness (_ _ _) and reasonable foreseeability ( v _)

Multiple causes (______ v _)

Intervening acts (____ v _)

Thin skull rule (___ v _ _ & .)