New game
Download
Get Academic Plan
Share game
Integrate it into your platform

You can integrate the game into an LMS compatible with LTI 1.1 or LTI 1.3 such as Canvas, Moodle, or Blackboard. This way, the scores will be automatically saved into the platform’s gradebook.
Download
You have exceeded the maximum number of games you can integrate into Google Classroom with your current Plan.

To integrate as many games as you want in Google Classroom, you need an Academic Plan or a Commercial Plan.

You have exceeded the maximum number of games you can integrate into Microsoft Teams with your current Plan.

To integrate as many games as you want in Microsoft Teams, you need an Academic Plan or a Commercial Plan.

Downloading games is an exclusive feature for users with an Academic Plan or a Commercial Plan.

Get your Academic Plan or your Commercial Plan now and start integrating your games into your LMS, website or blog.

If you wish, you can download a demo game here and test its integration:

Legal terms 1 - gap-fill (carousel fraud)

Fill in the Blanks

Played 1

About this activity

Fill in the gaps.

Created by

Hungary

Download the paper version to play

Make your own free game from our game creator
Compete against your friends to see who gets the best score in this game

Top Games

%
Anonymous
Anonymous
%
%
%
You have exceeded the maximum number of games you can print with your current Plan.

To print as many games as you want, you need an Academic Plan or a Commercial Plan.

Print your game
Legal terms 1 - gap-fill (carousel fraud)
 

Fill in the Blanks

Legal terms 1 - gap-fill (carousel fraud)Online version

Fill in the gaps.

by Boglárka Kozári
1

reasonable testimonies sentencing multiple carousel orchestrating conspiracy establish maintained aggravating alleged argued scheme pleaded account

During the trial , the defendant not guilty and consistently his innocence , insisting that he had no involvement in the criminal activities alleged against him . Despite his claims , the prosecution that the evidence presented was strong enough to the defendant ? s guilt beyond a doubt .

The case centered on a to commit VAT fraud , with the defendant named by law enforcement as the perpetrator primarily responsible for the scheme . The prosecution introduced significant evidence throughout the trial that proved his involvement in the fraudulent .

After carefully examining all the evidence and hearing the , the judges found the defendant guilty . During , the court took into an circumstance related to the defendant ? s prior convictions , which increased the potential severity of his sentence .
The fraudulent activity was linked to a large - scale fraud operation that manipulated VAT regulations across companies , resulting in significant financial losses to the government .

Are you sure you want to leave the page?

If you leave the page, you will lose your game progress.