Matching Pairs Matching Pairs Game (Content Needed)Online version Need the terms and definitions from the uploaded files to create pairs. by Eva 1 Rationality of adaptive learning 2 Depoliticisation 3 Post-structuralist 4 Modernism 5 Incrementalism 6 Post-politicisation or post-politics 7 Rationality of organized flexibility 8 Structuralism 9 Neo-liberalism 10 Rationality of self-responsibility A movement promoting rational thought and social organization as a way to free humanity from superstition, arbitrary power, and irrationality Focuses more on a series of techniques that defer and displace debate from planning into other, managerial or technical arenas Reject a single, totalising way of knowing A rationality that focuses on learning through adaptation Although capital is diverse and often in competition it depends upon certain basic factors to enable it to create surplus value and profit Policy makers cannot and do not think big A form of rationality in which organizations maintain structures that are flexible and adaptable A broad process of change and direction of travel that highlights the shifts in the nature of contemporary planning A rationality based on individuals or teams taking responsibility for their own actions rather than relying on hierarchical control. Seeks to understand and explain the purpose and impacts of planning as a function of the capitalist mode of production 1 Class III 2 Subject-based, rational dimension (S) 3 Object-oriented dimension (O) 4 Planning-oriented action 5 First order transition 6 Class IV 7 Second order transition 8 Class I 9 Intersubjective dimension (I) 10 Class II Closed, yes or no, on or off, living or dead; Steady equilibrium state Complex adaptive systems (CAS); capable of transforming while remaining robust City grows; grass turns into stone, farmland in turned into houses Circular or feedback of static groups or patterns; Oscillation between fixed states The organisation and communication of, and participation in, decision-making and policy Open, network, informal, chaotic; No predictable patterns or stability Action taken according to a pre-established plan to achieve specific objectives. What happens trough time; moments of stability where a market place stays a market place The physical and social reality that could be subject to policy-based or planning based intervention, now or in the future The choices made in the decision-making process 1 Substantive rationality 2 Polyrationality 3 Assertive rationality 4 Communicative rationality 5 Postulating rationality 6 Monorationality 7 Rationality 8 Technical rationality 9 Formal rationality 10 Anticipatory rationality A rationality that emphasizes forward-thinking and decision-making based on awareness of possible future developments, risks, and opportunities. A way of thinking and acting in which problems are treated as technical issues that can be solved through objective knowledge, A rationality characterized by confidence and initiative in pursuing one’s goals while still being reasoned and strategic. Works by explaining the outcome of places as being the product of four different rationalities: hierarchy, individualism, community and fatalism Any attempt to make stakeholders agree on a common future Concerns ends and their evaluation. A rationality focused on mutual understanding achieved through dialogue and argumentation A rationality that starts from certain assumptions or guiding principles and acts consistently with them Generating a set of rules of behaviour which conditions choice and results in choice preferences. Concerned with means and efficiency; given ends and objectives, it will seek to meet those ends in the most efficient way 1 Prescriptive theory 2 Traditional theory 3 Theorizing 4 Descriptive theory 5 Radical social theory 6 Systems theory 7 Empirical theory 8 Normative theory 9 Social theory 10 Proto theory How to world ought to be A catch-all category that covers thinking and debating ideas and other theories to ascertain their suitability and applicability How to go about things, or the means; How to act in this world. An acceptance that cities and regions are complex sets of connected parts, which are in constant flux How to understand this world (explaining) Not only reflects upon society but can also shape it in a way that natural sciences cannot. Explains and interprets reality and focuses on causal relationships and dependent and independent variables. Ideas we have that are not yet fully proven, we are working on it. (uncertain); Can this abstraction contribute to understanding? Understanding and explaining seeking an objective truth, ignoring power, interdependencies, values and meanings Exposes how society’s structures, especially capitalism, create inequality and oppression, aiming to reveal root causes and drive social change. 1 Critical theory 2 Communicative theory 3 Exogenous theory 4 Complexity theory 5 Marxist theory 6 Radical social theory 7 Conceptual frameworks 8 Models 9 Actor-Network Theory (ANT) 10 Framing theories Science is not separate from society but is instead thoroughly political Urban areas and planning cannot be treated as objects of study separate from society Draws upon empirical and metaphysical bases and is akin to some respects to the Kuhnian idea of paradigms Does not see planning issues as ‘realities’ in the outside world, they are seen as the abstract constructions of the various people involved. Linguistic analysis of situations and ideas leading to perspectives and critiques that might otherwise be lost. Emphasising the importance of the socio-political context with a particular interest in the contradictions of capitalism and the victims this produce The degree of complexity is seen as a measure for uncertainty The essence is to change society rather than simply understand and analyse it. Simple representations and pictures of reality that do not always include hypotheses but are still testable. Do not provide a holistic or general theoretical understanding of society but focus instead on a particular element of society