Normal vs Deaf: Primary School Achievements

Yes or No

Played 0

Create copy

About this activity

Comparing outcomes in young learners

Created by

rimmi gupta

India

Download the paper version to play

Top 10 results

There are still no results for this game. Be the first to stay in the ranking! Log in to identify yourself.

Make your own free game from our game creator

Compete against your friends to see who gets the best score in this game

Make challenge

Is it true?

Educaplay Educational Resources

Spain

(58)

Answer if the following sentences about general culture are true or not.
Is it created with Artificial Intelligence? - Complete game

Educaplay Educational Resources

Spain

(17)

Images, songs... Nothing is what it seems anymore. Are they generated with AI, or are they real?
Foot and Ankle Anatomy Quiz

Thilaxshi Suresh

United Kingdom

(9)

Test your knowledge of the bones, joints, and muscles of the foot and ankle with this interactive quiz. Answer with ✅ if the statement is correct and ❌ if it is incorrect.
Adjective Checker

Erika Moreno

Ecuador

(14)

In this game, you will have to determine if the adjective provided accurately describes the noun. Test your knowledge of adjectives and see if you can spot the correct matches!
Grammys for best song/record

Educaplay Educational Resources

Spain

(50)

Answer if these songs won the Grammy for Best Song or Record of the Year (the general ones, category Grammys do not count)


Normal vs Deaf: Primary School AchievementsOnline version Comparing outcomes in young learners by rimmi gupta 1 The study compares the educational achievements of normal and deaf primary students. Yes No 2 Inclusion programs had no impact on the achievement gap between groups. Yes No 3 Sign language use reduces literacy development in primary education. Yes No 4 Deaf students benefit from sign language access in classrooms. Yes No 5 Visual aids and assistive technology enhance learning for deaf pupils. Yes No 6 All deaf students learn at the same pace as non-deaf peers without any adaptations. Yes No 7 The study found that deaf students outperformed hearing students in science. Yes No 8 Deaf students always lag behind normal peers in every subject. Yes No 9 Inclusive education approaches can lead to similar literacy outcomes for both groups. Yes No 10 Supportive teaching practices can help reduce achievement gaps for deaf students. Yes No

Normal vs Deaf: Primary School AchievementsOnline version

Comparing outcomes in young learners

by rimmi gupta

The study compares the educational achievements of normal and deaf primary students.

Yes

Inclusion programs had no impact on the achievement gap between groups.

Yes

Sign language use reduces literacy development in primary education.

Yes

Deaf students benefit from sign language access in classrooms.

Yes

Visual aids and assistive technology enhance learning for deaf pupils.

Yes

All deaf students learn at the same pace as non-deaf peers without any adaptations.

Yes

The study found that deaf students outperformed hearing students in science.

Yes

Deaf students always lag behind normal peers in every subject.

Yes

Inclusive education approaches can lead to similar literacy outcomes for both groups.

Yes

Supportive teaching practices can help reduce achievement gaps for deaf students.

Yes

You can integrate the game into an LMS compatible with LTI 1.1 or LTI 1.3 such as Canvas, Moodle, or Blackboard. This way, the scores will be automatically saved into the platform’s gradebook.

Normal vs Deaf: Primary School Achievements

Yes or No

About this activity

Created by

Download the paper version to play

Top Games

Yes or No

Is it true?

Yes or No

Is it created with Artificial Intelligence? - Complete game

Yes or No

Foot and Ankle Anatomy Quiz

Yes or No

Adjective Checker

Yes or No

Grammys for best song/record

Normal vs Deaf: Primary School AchievementsOnline version

by rimmi gupta

The study compares the educational achievements of normal and deaf primary students.

Inclusion programs had no impact on the achievement gap between groups.

Sign language use reduces literacy development in primary education.

Deaf students benefit from sign language access in classrooms.

Visual aids and assistive technology enhance learning for deaf pupils.

All deaf students learn at the same pace as non-deaf peers without any adaptations.

The study found that deaf students outperformed hearing students in science.

Deaf students always lag behind normal peers in every subject.

Inclusive education approaches can lead to similar literacy outcomes for both groups.

Supportive teaching practices can help reduce achievement gaps for deaf students.

		%
	Anonymous	%
		%
		%