New game
Download
SCORM download
To be used in an LMS (Moodle, Blackboard...)
Regular download
To be published on a website or blog.
Downloading games is an exclusive feature for users with an Academic Plan or a Commercial Plan.
Get your Academic Plan or your Commercial Plan now and start integrating your games into your LMS, website or blog.
Get Academic Plan
If you wish, you can download a demo game here and test its integration:
Share game
Video Quiz
Video Quiz

The Argument Detective

Integrate it into your platform
G. Classroom M. Teams
You can integrate the game into an LMS compatible with LTI 1.1 or LTI 1.3 such as Canvas, Moodle, or Blackboard. This way, the scores will be automatically saved into the platform’s gradebook.
Download
You have exceeded the maximum number of games you can integrate into Google Classroom with your current Plan.

To integrate as many games as you want in Google Classroom, you need an Academic Plan or a Commercial Plan.

Get Academic Plan
You have exceeded the maximum number of games you can integrate into Microsoft Teams with your current Plan.

To integrate as many games as you want in Microsoft Teams, you need an Academic Plan or a Commercial Plan.

Get Academic Plan
Downloading games is an exclusive feature for users with an Academic Plan or a Commercial Plan.

Get your Academic Plan or your Commercial Plan now and start integrating your games into your LMS, website or blog.

If you wish, you can download a demo game here and test its integration:

Get Academic Plan

The Argument Detective

Video Quiz

Played 2
Create copy

About this activity

The Argument Detective is an interactive video quiz designed for Year 10 IGCSE Global Perspectives students. Based on the StarTalk video "How to Tell What’s Real Online," the quiz challenges students to apply critical thinking skills to evaluate the reliability of digital information.

As "detectives," students must listen for "red flags" and "yellow flags" in Neil deGrasse Tyson's explanation. The activity focuses on identifying key exam concepts such as Vested Interest, Bias, Cherry-picking, and Inadequate Evidence.

Created by

Thian Pik Hang
Thian Pik Hang
Malaysia

Download the paper version to play

Make your own free game from our game creator
Compete against your friends to see who gets the best score in this game
Make challenge

Top Games

 %
Anonymous
Anonymous
 %
%
%
You have exceeded the maximum number of games you can print with your current Plan.

To print as many games as you want, you need an Academic Plan or a Commercial Plan.

Get Academic Plan
Print your game
The Argument Detective
 

The Argument DetectiveOnline version

The Argument Detective is an interactive video quiz designed for Year 10 IGCSE Global Perspectives students. Based on the StarTalk video "How to Tell What’s Real Online," the quiz challenges students to apply critical thinking skills to evaluate the reliability of digital information. As "detectives," students must listen for "red flags" and "yellow flags" in Neil deGrasse Tyson's explanation. The activity focuses on identifying key exam concepts such as Vested Interest, Bias, Cherry-picking, and Inadequate Evidence.

by Thian Pik Hang
QR
1

Tyson mentions checking if his own views influence his research. This is:

2

Someone defending an industry they work in has a "yellow flag" due to:

3

If a source tells you "how you should feel" rather than giving data, it is:

4

Using 90 seconds of a 2-hour talk to change the meaning is an example of:

5

Tyson says a result "might prove to be true" after more research. This is:

6

Using one disproven study while ignoring hundreds of others is:

7

Claiming a "conspiracy" exists to fill a gap where data is missing is a flaw in:

8

Claiming that "mainstream" views are a secret "cover-up" is often:

9

Indicting an entire demographic (e.g., "The Jews" or "The Blacks") is:

10

Saying "I hate Big Pharma" treats a whole industry as a "monolith." This is:

11

Claiming one invention will "render an entire industry obsolete" is:

12

Claiming aliens exist based only on "fuzzy video" or "eyewitnesses" is:

13

Evaluating all evidence to reach a logical conclusion is called:

Explanation

Bias is an unfair preference or a one-sided view. It’s a "yellow flag" because it means the researcher might be ignoring evidence that contradicts their personal feelings.

Vested Interest occurs when someone has a personal or financial motive (like a job or money) to support a specific idea. This makes their neutrality questionable.

A Fact can be proven, but an Opinion is a belief or feeling. If the author is trying to "hand you" their feelings, they are trying to persuade you emotionally, not logically.

This is also known as "quoting out of context." By selecting only a small part, the author hides the full picture to support their own view.

A Prediction is a claim about what will happen in the future. It isn't a fact yet because it hasn't been proven true in the present.

Cherry-picking is a flaw where someone intentionally "picks" only the data that helps them and ignores the vast majority of evidence that goes against them.

A Reasoned Argument should follow a logical path: Evidence → Explanation → Conclusion. Using a "conspiracy" to jump to a conclusion is a logical leap.

Discussing how the word "mainstream" is often used to make personal views seem like hidden truths. He points out that if a person on social media claims, "mainstream is wrong and they're suppressing my view which is correct," it is a clear sign that they are trying to push their personal perspective as a hidden truth.

Generalisation takes a small observation and applies it to every person in a group. It is a weak argument because it ignores individual diversity.

Like demographics, lumping an entire Industry together as if they all act the same is a generalisation that ignores companies with different moral codes.

Exaggeration (Hyperbole) makes something sound much bigger or more important than it really is to manipulate the reader's sense of urgency.

Highlighting that "eyewitness testimony" or "fuzzy videos" are not sufficient proof for extraordinary claims. In IGCSE terms, eyewitness testimony is often considered anecdotal evidence, which is a form of inadequate evidence because human memory is unreliable and cannot be verified by others. Tyson’s point is a great way to teach students about proportionality in evidence. If a source makes a massive claim (e.g., "This new technology will save the world"), but only provides a single person's story as proof, the student should identify this as inadequate evidence because the proof is too weak for the size of the claim.

A Reasoned Judgment is the goal of Global Perspectives. It is a conclusion reached by looking at all facts, acknowledging bias, and following logic.

 
Are you sure you want to leave the page?

If you leave the page, you will lose your game progress.