New game
Download
Get Academic Plan
Share game
Integrate it into your platform

You can integrate the game into an LMS compatible with LTI 1.1 or LTI 1.3 such as Canvas, Moodle, or Blackboard. This way, the scores will be automatically saved into the platform’s gradebook.
Download
You have exceeded the maximum number of games you can integrate into Google Classroom with your current Plan.

To integrate as many games as you want in Google Classroom, you need an Academic Plan or a Commercial Plan.

You have exceeded the maximum number of games you can integrate into Microsoft Teams with your current Plan.

To integrate as many games as you want in Microsoft Teams, you need an Academic Plan or a Commercial Plan.

Downloading games is an exclusive feature for users with an Academic Plan or a Commercial Plan.

Get your Academic Plan or your Commercial Plan now and start integrating your games into your LMS, website or blog.

If you wish, you can download a demo game here and test its integration:

Invalidez del silogismo: un error lógico

Riddle

Played 0

About this activity

Desentraña un silogismo inválido

Created by

Ecuador

Download the paper version to play

Make your own free game from our game creator
Compete against your friends to see who gets the best score in this game

Top Games

%
Anonymous
Anonymous
%
%
%
You have exceeded the maximum number of games you can print with your current Plan.

To print as many games as you want, you need an Academic Plan or a Commercial Plan.

Print your game
Invalidez del silogismo: un error lógico
 

Invalidez del silogismo: un error lógicoOnline version

Desentraña un silogismo inválido

by Sarahi Chiriboga
1

Premisa mayor: Todos los mamíferos tienen pelo. Premisa menor: Todos los perros tienen pelo. Conclusión: Por lo tanto, todos los perros son mamíferos. ¿Qué falla en este razonamiento y por qué es inválido?

Pistas

Piensa en un contraejemplo: ¿todos los Pérez que tienen pelo son mamíferos? ¿Conclusión válida si solo por pelo se deduce pertenencia a mamíferos?

El hecho de que dos grupos compartan una propiedad no implica que uno pertenezca al otro. Busca una relación de inclusión entre categorías, no una propiedad común.

Observa si la segunda premisa vincula explícitamente a la sujeto de la conclusión (perros) con la clase mayor (mamíferos).

Are you sure you want to leave the page?

If you leave the page, you will lose your game progress.